Thanksgiving is NOT about pilgrims?

November 25th, 2008

I always thought the Pilgrims and Indians were the first to celebrate Thanksgiving. False.

I always thought that President Abraham Lincoln was the first President to call it a holiday. False.

I thought it was about eating loads food. False.

President George Washington was the first President to ask the nation to celebrate it. It is about being thankful for the Constitution we have. And it was a day of fasting and prayer in thanks to God for establishing our country.

Have a read about the TRUE meaning of Thanksgiving in Benton's blog.

My only question is: Why did I not know this before?

Posted by email from Jeffrey’s posterous

Acrobat.com PDF veiwer

November 20th, 2008

I just wanted to show you the new Acrobat PDF viewer. It is pretty amazing. I know one of the fonts in the book is messed up. That happened before I uploaded it. Sorry, I just pulled a junk file so I could show you the embed viewer.

2008 elections: Rejoicing and Worry

November 7th, 2008

Watching our new President-elect's acceptance speech yesterday was a surprising thrill. I found myself caught with some emotion and I felt proud to be an American as our country symbolically steps away from racism.

Proposition 8 also passed. This was an enormous relief for me.  An answer to prayer and a wonderful win to protect the family and hold off a collision course between gay rights and religious freedom.
 
But my emotions were bittersweet. Obama's rhetoric is downright socialist and scary and the gay rights activists have already filed suit against Prop 8. I was listening to Glenn Beck just during the election. A young man called in and asked, "What do I do now?" Glenn gave some great advice: "Get a copy of and study the constitution. Learn everything about it. Read the Federlist Papers. Learn what Founders really taught."

If you are a Mormon then you might have already heard Elder Packer's talk last month on the Constitution called "The Test". Here he talks about a celebration the Saints held in honor of the US (a country that had just chased them from their homes):

"Three things about that 1849 commemoration were both symbolic and
prophetic: first, that the young men carried the Constitution and the
Declaration of Independence; next, that each young woman carried the
Bible and the Book of Mormon; and finally, that the old men—the Silver
Greys—were honored in the parade.

"After the program they had a feast at makeshift tables. Several
hundred gold-rush travelers and 60 Indians were invited to join them.

"Then they went back to work."

Lets celebrate the peaceful elections this country just afforded us. Let's honor this historical moment in our history as we prepare for our first black President. Let the rising generation grasp to the Constitution and Declaration of Indepenence in hand with our holy writ, and let us turn to our wise "silver greys" for council. Now I got to get back to work. (:

Posted by email from Jeffrey’s posterous

Inspiring Hate - Those Against Prop 8

November 4th, 2008

As the election has neared, my attention has left the Presidential Election and gone to the Proposition 8. I have donated to the campaign and spent many hours in the front lines of the blogosphere. It has been messy and disturbing to say the least. Who will win tonight, I do not know. But my feeling is that all the big media and money against Prop 8 will not hold when it is placed up against the tight knit communities of churches and close families. My feeling is that family and trusted friends still wield the greatest influence, even over Hollywood and the Media elite.

But even if Prop 8 pulls out in a win, a sobering realization has set in on me, a time of great religious discrimination is not far from us. We have been framed as “Haters”, “Bigots”, and “Discriminators”.  If I was an outsider reading and watching their statements about the Yes on 8 campaign, I would wonder if Prop 8 was the re-institution of slavery. In contrast here are the actual words to be added to the constitution: “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”

Google (who openly opposes 8 ) is in hot water for allowing Yes on 8 ads to display on sites that disagree with Prop 8.

“Denying a fundamental right to a person - such as marriage - is hateful and
backwards,” wrote Michael Arrington on TechCrunch. “Google doesn’t have any
obligation to run ads like these, and I believe they would be correct in
banning.”

I like TechCrunch, but this is just a tizzy-fit. What about freedom of speech? Who says marriage is a “fundamental right”? A few judges? Let the legal process take its path and let people hold their opinions. Influence will not come by banning those who are in favor of it. You are asking for the same thing you claim to be against, discrimination.

Even scarier is this ad showing “Mormon missionaries” invading a home to tear up a marriage certificate:

I take serious offense to this as I served a two year mission in Ireland, paying my own way just to answer a call from the Lord to serve His children. Everyone who knows Mormons knows this is plain false. This ad is just plain WRONG and segregating us because we put our money behind our opinions and beliefs.

What is the result of the unfair labeling and name calling? Homes have been vandalized, tens of thousands of Yes on 8 signs have been stolen and destroyed. People have been attacked in the streets (there have been a little both ways, but very little on the Yes on 8 side). And the Mormon church, whose members should be admired for coming out and standing for their standards even with their wallets in a time of recession and economic collapse, have been attacked with nothing less than hatred.

Actions speak louder than words and the only people I see inspiring words and actions of hate, discrimination, and bigotry is the No on 8 campaign.

Posted by email from Jeffrey’s posterous

Aviary’s “Toucan” - How to pick beautiful colors for your website

October 28th, 2008

I love Aviary.com. Other than a “free photoshop” online, they also have a color picker called Toucan. I don’t know about you, but I see so many beautiful sites on the Internet. Some professionals just have a talent for picking the perfect color combination, they can take any colors you ask for and make them beautiful. Fortunately for people like me Toucan is a FREE (they let you pay if you want) way to pick perfect colors for your website without being a pro.

If you need an overhall for the colors on your website watch this video:

AncestryPress.com is now MyCanvas.com… What?

October 27th, 2008

I don't know when. Why I am even more clueless, but AncestryPress changed their name to MyCanvas.com. From a branding standpoint it just seems strange. Why confuse all your customers with a new name after over a year of being up? They also have this strange loading bar that generically says: "Powered by MyCanvas". In the top left it has Ancestry.com still written. I am wondering if they are going to try and use MyCanvas to move cross platforms to MyFamily.com as well?

The new MyCanvas barrows a lot of UI ideas from MemoryPress, particularly the sliding panes on the right side (they are on the left in MyCanvas). Although MemoryPress is still a typesetting system for real books while MyCanvas is a glorified photobook.

Posted by email from Jeffrey’s posterous

facebook now has English but for Pirates

October 23rd, 2008

I just found this on facebook’s languages:

It made me laugh.

Another thing I noticed that I really like about their languages is that they don’t try and write all of their langauges in English. You can see that English is in English, Français is in French. It would make sense that if you are looking for Chinese it will be easier for you to find your language in Chinese.

One more thing, I think it is brilliant that facebook has an application that lets their users translate the site for them. Each phrase on the site is translated and then voted on by the users. Makes for much better translations.  I think we will use this idea on Pixlin one day.

Proposition 8 - Why is the Teachers Union donating $1 million dollars if there is no effect on Education?

October 23rd, 2008

I think this is a valid question. I have seen dozens of articles saying that Proposition 8 supporters are lieing when they say this is going to affect education. If this is true why in the world is the Teachers Union putting money into it at all? That is because it is going to affect education:

…the California Department of Education (CDE) Web site notes specifically that in the 96 percent of school districts that do accept the curriculum, they are REQUIRED to include instruction and materials that “teach respect for marriage.”

Preserving the Divine Institution of Marriage

October 10th, 2008

A few years ago I wrote this post in defense of the Marriage amendment. The debate is back and my Church (which never gets into politics) is now in the fight. If you want a heavy weight on your side of a fight, you won’t find a better one that the Mormon church. The granting of same sex marriage as a “civil right” will directly affect the future of freedom of religion as we know it. Proposition 8 MUST pass.

I found this video at: http://www.preservingmarriage.org/

Chris Cannon is not a true Representative of the People

October 2nd, 2008

I just made my first phone call ever to one of my Representatives. I am vehemently against the controversial Bail Out plan to be voted on (again) tomorrow. Contacting Chris Cannon was easy with the help of Campaign for Liberty, but Cannon’s office’s response was far different from that I expected.

I told them I was disappointed that Cannon had voted in favor of the bill last run through and that I wanted to express my opposition.

“It is like handing Paulson a $700b BLANK check” I explained. “Then saying, ‘I have no idea what is really going on, but it is scary. Here is our freedom and our money… You look like a smart fellow. Please save us.’”

“It is actually just $250b to start.” The man responded, “and their will be congressional oversight over much of the money.”

I was a little taken back at his tone of voice. “$250b or $700b, the powers granted to the Executive Branch are the same and they will never be revoked… Every economist I have read in the past 2 weeks says it will be FAR over $700b by the time it is done… on top of that, when has Congress been good at oversight of any money?”

“What would you do instead?” The gentleman asked.

“I would let the prices of houses fall until they find their actually market value. I would let those who did bad business take the fall they deserve. Yes it will hurt, but it must happen. We can’t just prop up unnatural prices and expect them to stay there. You are only increasing the size of a future crash. To be honest, if I had to choose between the two, I would rather struggle through another depression than hand over my freedoms and live in this form of Socialism. Although I don’t think we will need to live through a depression just yet.” I stated.

He started to respond, “…I disagree with you about calling it Socialism…”

“What is Socialism then? Define it for me.” I interrupted. (note: it is absolutely Marxist)

He dodged my question and said, “you have to understand the markets are frozen right now and we have to do something.”

I told him Cannon would be gone if he votes for this. His response was repulsive. He said “Cannon is not up for reelection this term so he is not influenced by the vote in November.”

Our conversation ended shortly afterward. I am appalled that Congressman Chris Cannon would vote for the bail out knowing the whole time that his constituents are against it. The most recent poll I could find show that only 30% of Americans even think the Government should bail out the banks while 63% are against it. Utah is a conservative state and I am sure the numbers are even higher. How can Cannon have the arrogance to ignore not only the constitution but the people as well?!

One of my good friends from high school asked me today when I started liking politics so much. My response, “I don’t like politics at all, but I love freedom and the constitution. I think the two are separate.”

I will end this with a quote from the opening statement of The Law (one of my favorite books on government because it is so short) by Frederic Bastiat:

The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law become the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!

If this is true, it is a serious fact, and moral duty requires me to call the attention of my fellow-citizens to it.

Oh, and just so you know, Congressman Robert Bishop and Congressman Jim Matheson both voted no and plan to vote no again.

I hope I inspired some of you to contact your Congressman as well. C’mon it is easy, only takes 5 minutes.


Close
E-mail It